On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:33:09AM +0100, Thomas Rast wrote: > Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > #: builtin/reset.c:275 > > -#, fuzzy, c-format > > +#, c-format > > msgid "Failed to resolve '%s' as a valid revision." > > -msgstr "Konnte '%s' nicht als gültige Referenz auflösen." > > +msgstr "Konnte '%s' nicht als gültige Revision auflösen." > > You don't have "revision" in the glossary[1] yet. Wouldn't it be > appropriate to treat it as "commit", and translate as "Version" to avoid > introducing yet another term? > > Or am I missing some subtle distinction between commit and revision? > I don't think there's a distinction. Since we've already translated "revision" as "Revision" in a couple of other messages, I'll make a new "s/Revision/Version" commit on top. > Since it's only a single nit, feel free to add my ack when you reroll: > > Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > [1] https://github.com/ralfth/git-po-de/wiki/Glossary > > -- > Thomas Rast > trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html