Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] sequencer.c: teach append_signoff how to detect duplicate s-o-b

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Casey <drafnel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Brandon Casey wrote:
>>
>>> Teach append_signoff how to detect a duplicate s-o-b in the commit footer.
>>> This is in preparation to unify the append_signoff implementations in
>>> log-tree.c and sequencer.c.
>> [...]
>>> --- a/sequencer.c
>>> +++ b/sequencer.c
>>> @@ -1082,9 +1101,10 @@ int sequencer_pick_revisions(struct replay_opts *opts)
>>>       return pick_commits(todo_list, opts);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -void append_signoff(struct strbuf *msgbuf, int ignore_footer)
>>> +void append_signoff(struct strbuf *msgbuf, int ignore_footer, int no_dup_sob)
>>
>> Isn't the behavior of passing '1' here just a bug in "format-patch -s"?
>
> I think that is an open question.

Yes. as I said in a previous review round, I think it was a mistake
that format-patch chose to pay attention to any S-o-b in the patch
trail, not only the last one, and we may want to correcct it once
this series solidifies as a separate "bugfix" change on top.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]