Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] sequencer.c: teach append_signoff how to detect duplicate s-o-b

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Casey wrote:

> Teach append_signoff how to detect a duplicate s-o-b in the commit footer.
> This is in preparation to unify the append_signoff implementations in
> log-tree.c and sequencer.c.
[...]
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -1082,9 +1101,10 @@ int sequencer_pick_revisions(struct replay_opts *opts)
>  	return pick_commits(todo_list, opts);
>  }
>
> -void append_signoff(struct strbuf *msgbuf, int ignore_footer)
> +void append_signoff(struct strbuf *msgbuf, int ignore_footer, int no_dup_sob)

Isn't the behavior of passing '1' here just a bug in "format-patch -s"?

Style: callers will be easier to read if the function takes a flag
word with named bits, as in:

	#define APPEND_SIGNOFF_DEDUP (1 << 0)
	void append_signoff(..., int ignore_footer, unsigned flag)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]