Re: [RFH] NetBSD 6?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg Troxel <gdt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I realize a README.foo file for N different systems could be clutter,
> but having these checked in would provide the concise help that people
> on any of those platforms need.

Our Makefile documents knobs people on various platforms can tweak
(PYTHON_PATH and OLD_ICONV are two examples of them), sets default
values for them based on $(uname -S), then includes config.mak file
the user can optionally create to override these platform defaults.
This infrastructure is used across platforms, not just for NetBSD.

The part shown in the patch was to update the platform default for
NetBSD.  The setting we have been shipping in our Makefile seemed to
be different from what I needed on my NetBSD 6 install, and I was
wondering if we have no real users of Git on the platorm (which
would explain why we didn't get any complaints or patches to update
this part).  Or there are some optional packages all real NetBSD
users install, but being a NetBSD newbie I didn't, that makes the
values I showed in the patch inappropriate for them (e.g. Perhaps
there is a mechanism other than pkgsrc that installs perl and python
under /usr/bin?  Perhaps an optional libi18n package that gives
iconv(3) with new function signature?), in which case I definitely
should not apply that patch to my tree, as it would only be an
improvement for one person and a regression for existing users at
the same time.





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]