> Nicely analysed. Perhaps we would want new test pieces to define > the behaviour we want to see first? I think we should. I also thought about the use case of "committed" and ignored directory which is also broken to me (point 3 in the table below). Anyway I tried to make a table to sum-up/discuss the list of behaviors we would like to see/test, taking Jeff mail into account. (warning: that requires fixed width font) |----------------------+---------------------+---------------------------| | Output | A. status --ignored | B. status --ignored -uall | | | | (or with potential | | | | --ignored=all) | |----------------------+---------------------+---------------------------| | 1. Untracked dirU | Current: | Current: | | with ignored unco.ig | Empty | Empty | | in it | | | | | Expected: | Expected: | | | !!dirU/ | !!dirU/unco.ig | |----------------------+---------------------+---------------------------| | 2. Untracked and | Current (OK): | Current: | | ignored dirU with | !!dirU/ | !!dirU/ | | file in it | | | | | | Expected: | | | | !!dirU/unco | |----------------------+---------------------+---------------------------| | 3. "Committed" dirA | Current: | Current: | | yet ignored | Empty | Empty | | with uncommitted | | | | file in it | Expected: | Expected: | | | dirA/ | dirA/unco | |----------------------+---------------------+---------------------------| -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html