Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> If "git frotz" wants to have a separate "color.frotz" option to override
> that, then they would need to implement that themselves either with or
> without your patch. I do not think its presence makes things any harder.
That _was_ (but no longer is) exactly my point. Eh, rather, its
absense does not make things any harder.
> So no, I do not think you can cover every conceivable case. But having
> git-log respect --color and the usual color.* variables for this feature
> seems like the only sane default. It makes the easy cases just work, and
> the hard cases are not any worse off (and they may even be better off,
> since the script can manipulate --color instead of rewriting their
> format strings, but that is a minor difference).
OK, care to reroll the one with your patch in the other message
squashed in, possibly with fixes to the test (the result should now
honor --color={always,never}, I think)?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html