Re: git-svnimport failed and now git-repack hates me

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Lee <chris133@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also, 'git-prune' took about 30 minutes to run to completion. Oddly,
> git-prune didn't remove the older packs - does git-prune ignore packs?
> 'git-repack -a -d' did remove them.

git-prune is expensive.  Very expensive on very large projects,
as it must iterate every object to decide what is needed, before
it can start to remove objects that aren't needed.

Yes, it doesn't deal with removing pack files.  That's what the -d
to git-repack is for.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]