Re: Pushing into a repository with working directory?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Special casing the 'current' branch makes any sort of automated push
> > setup unreliable.  Indeed the special case preventing a fetch into the
> > current branch is pretty annoying for the same reason.  I would almost
> > prefer to relax that than add the same for push.
> 
> How would you relax the fetch case?  Fetching into the current
> branch, unless the repository is bare, is always a fishy
> operation.

And so is pushing into the current branch, so long as the current
branch has a working directory attached to it.

Most new users to Git expect to be able to push into the current
branch of a repository and `just have it work`.  Only they don't
really seem to have an idea of _how_ that operation should behave,
which means they really don't want it to work at all.  I certainly
don't want an operation to succeed if I can't reason about what
its success means!

Right now pushing into the current branch makes the index become
way out of sync from HEAD.  This causes git-runstatus to display a
large number of differences, basically undoing any of the changes
introduced by HEAD@{1}..HEAD.  The user is left with a dirty
working tree that they can commit - and committing it will just
revert the prior commits.  The user will later cuss at Git for
losing their changes.  Not pretty.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]