Re: Millisecond precision in timestamps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Eric S. Raymond <esr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Roundtrip conversions may benefit from sub-second timestamps, but
>> personally I think negative timestamps are more interesting and of
>> practical use.
>
> You mean, as in times before the Unix epoch 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z?
>
> Interesting.  I hadn't thought of that.  I've never seen a software
> project under version control with bits that old, which is significant
> because I've probably done more digging into ancient software than
> anybody other than a specialist historian or two.

One example I've heard is someone wanting to throw the history
of a country's laws into git so they can diff them.
-- 
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]