Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> --- a/git-send-email.perl
>> +++ b/git-send-email.perl
>> @@ -924,6 +924,10 @@ sub quote_subject {
>> # use the simplest quoting being able to handle the recipient
>> sub sanitize_address {
>> my ($recipient) = @_;
>> +
>> + # remove garbage after email address
>> + $recipient =~ s/(.*?<[^>]*>).*$/$1/;
>
> That won't work for 'foo@xxxxxxx # test'. I think we should abandon
> hopes of properly parsing an email address and just do:
>
> $recipient =~ s/(.*?) #.*$/$1/;
We should probably fix the tools that generate these bogus
non-addresses first. What's wrong with
Cc: stable kernel (v3.5 v3.6 v3.7) <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
which should be OK?
Also I suspect that this should be also deemed valid:
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Stable kernel - v3.5 v3.6 v3.7)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html