Re: [PATCH 1/3] t9350: point out that refs are not updated correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> Does it mean that? I don't think so, but let's assume that's the case.
>>
>> We don't have all those commits; without the marks we have nothing. Or
>> what exactly do you mean by 'we'?
>
> Not everyone uses marks.

When you don't have marks you have to export *everything* that you are
interested. If you want all the history from the root to master, then
that's what you will get (and you specify 'master'), if you want only
the commit pointed to master and nothing else that's what you will get
(with 'master^..master'), but when you do 'master..master', you get
nothing, because that's what you asked for.

Again, if you don't have marks, I don't see what you expect to be
exported with 'master..master', even with marks, I don't see what you
expect.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]