Re: [PATCH 1/3] t9350: point out that refs are not updated correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Felipe,

Felipe Contreras wrote:

> This test is completely wrong.
>
> 1) Where are the marks file?
> 2) master..master shouldn't export anything

Why shouldn't master..master export anything?  It means "update the
master ref; we already have all commits up to and including master^0".

The underlying problem is that fast-export takes rev-list arguments as
parameters, which is unfortunately only an approximation to what is
really intended.  Ideally it would separately take a list of refs to
import and rev-list arguments representing the commits we already
have.

Hoping that clarifies,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]