Re: [PATCH 3/6] pretty: prepare notes message at a centralized place

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:17:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > It's possible that switching it would create bugs elsewhere (there are
> > over 100 uses of strbuf_detach, so maybe somebody really does want this
> > NULL behavior), but I tend to think it is just as likely to be fixing
> > undiscovered bugs.
> 
> Yeah, I tend to agree.
> 
> This "format-patch --notes" is obviously a post 1.8.0 topic, and so
> is the strbuf_detach() clean-up.  Let me bookmark this thread in
> case it hasn't been resolved when I came back from my vacation, so
> that I won't forget ;-).

Actually, I have found a few segfaults, one of them remotely triggerable
in http-backend. I think it can probably wait until post-1.8.0 as it
does not have any security implications, though.

Details in a moment.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]