Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yes, but being costly in terms of performance is IMO a lot better than > corrupting refs, which is what we currently do. I'm not saying nothing should be done, but I'm not sure packed-refs are the right solution in the long term. We already have the foo Vs foo/bar issue (discussed in the "keeping reflog for deleted refs" discussion). I think the right way would be to re-think the way we map ref name to the filesystem, with proper escaping of capitals, slashes, ... But that's a rather big change to do (and I'm unlikely to be the one volunteering for it :-( ) -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html