Re: git checkout -b following git reset --hard pitfall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Maris, Rob" <maris.rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Normally, when there are modifications in the working tree not yet added
> resp. committed, git will refuse to change to another branch.

Only if switching the branch requires touching the modified files.

> Actually, the modified
> status of git related to both branches after git checkout -b can have
> following consequences:
>
> - it is lost definitely when git reset -hard is executed

This is true regardless.

> - if committed, it is committed into the newly created branch

This is often the desired state, and there is no harm in doing it
accidentally.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]