> From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gitster@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 6:41 PM > To: Joachim Schmitz > Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Support for setitimer() on platforms lacking it > > "Joachim Schmitz" <jojo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > HP NonStop (currently) doesn't have setitimer(). The previous attempt of an > > emulation (reverted by this commit) was not a real substitute for a recurring > > itimer (as here we also don't have SA_RESTART, so can't re-arm the timer). > > As setitimer() is only used in cases of perceived latency and it doesn't affect > > correctness, it now gets disabled entirely, if NO_SETITIMER is set. > > HP NonStop does provide struct itimerval, but other platforms may not, so this > > is taken care of in this commit too, by setting NO_STRUCT_ITIMERVAL. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joachim Schmitz <jojo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The end-result looks simple and nice (thanks for NO_STRUCT_ITIMERVAL). > > As we are not going to include the earlier failed attempt in our > longer-term history (i.e. 'master', that never rewinds), however, > I would prefer to see a replacement patch (as opposed to this one > that incrementally updates the previous failed attempt). I could > squash this into the previous one myself though ;-) Yes, please ;-) Bye, Jojo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html