Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > So in other words, I do not think any ultimate destination that I find > palatable would be achievable without making the full format jump > anyway. If all things were equal, I'd say there is no reason not to get > as close as we can. But I find some of the proposals significantly less > readable (in particular, the directory-munging is IMHO much harder to > read). And it is not as if it is buying us anything; you still have to > make a magic translation between a dead log and a live one. Yes, that is where the earlier comment of mine on this topic came from. > Another option I've considered is simply holding back the graveyard > topic, working on the d/f tolerant storage, and then implementing the > graveyards on top (which is basically free at that point). But as you > note, it is not really a commonly-requested feature. If it were easy, > I'd say let's do it. But the idea of bumping repositoryformatversion for > the first time in git's history just to add a feature nobody wants is > not very appealing to me. Amen. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html