mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Given that a flag day would anyway be required to add a d/f-tolerant > system, I could live with a separate "graveyard" namespace as > originally proposed by Jeff. > > However, I still think that as long as we are making a jump, we could > try to land closer to the ultimate destination. Do we _know_ already what the "ultimate destination" looks like? If the answer is yes, then I agree, but otherwise, I doubt it is a good idea to introduce unnecessary complexity to the system that may have to be ripped out and redone. I didn't get the impression that we know the "ultimate destination" from the previous discussion, especially if we discount the tangent around "having next and next/foo at the same time" which was on nobody's wish, but I may be misremembering things. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html