Re: [PATCH] tests: Introduce test_seq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:53:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Wouldn't it be cleaner and readable to write it like this
> 
> 	"$PERL_PATH" -le 'print for $ARGV[0]..$ARGV[1]' "$1" "$2"
> 
> by the way?

Yeah, that would be more robust (it's longer to type, which is why I
avoided it in the inline replacement, but since we're factoring it out,
that's not an issue).

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]