On Monday 30 July 2012 14:15:53 Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> + /* > >>> + * If the remote helper advertised the "refspec" capability, > >>> + * it will have the written result of the import to the refs > > > > perhaps s/will have the written result of/would have written result of/? > > That would sound like 'If the remote helper advertised the "refspec" > capability, it would have written the result of the import to the > refs, but it didn't, so...', so I think "will" is the right tense. > But 'will have the written' is awkward. How about: Yes, thats clearly a typing error of mine, 'the' is to be deleted. > > * The fast-import stream of a remote helper advertising the > * "refspec" capability writes to the refs named after the right > * hand side of the first refspec matching each ref we were > * fetching. > * > * (If no "refspec" capability is specified, for historical > * reasons the default is *:*.) > * > * Store the result in to_fetch[i].old_sha1. [...] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html