Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> + /* >>> + * If the remote helper advertised the "refspec" capability, >>> + * it will have the written result of the import to the refs > > perhaps s/will have the written result of/would have written result of/? That would sound like 'If the remote helper advertised the "refspec" capability, it would have written the result of the import to the refs, but it didn't, so...', so I think "will" is the right tense. But 'will have the written' is awkward. How about: * The fast-import stream of a remote helper advertising the * "refspec" capability writes to the refs named after the right * hand side of the first refspec matching each ref we were * fetching. * * (If no "refspec" capability is specified, for historical * reasons the default is *:*.) * * Store the result in to_fetch[i].old_sha1. [...] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html