Re: [GSoC] Designing a faster index format - Progress report week 13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio's index-v4 was a speed boost mainly because it cuts down on the
> size of the index.  Do we want to throw that out?

That's pretty much orthogonal, isn't it?

The index-v4 is merely to show how a stupid prefix compression of
pathnames without nothing else would reduce the file size and I/O
cost, in order to set the bar for anything more clever than that.

I thought that this discussion is about keeping, squishing, or
discarding part of the cached stat info, and nobody is suggesting
what to do with the prefix compression of pathnames.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]