Re: [GSoC] Designing a faster index format - Progress report week 13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> A note on how JGit would work here. Java has none of the fields
> that constitute statcrc. I guess we would write zero here when
> creating new entries. Git could recognize that when checking status
> and simply assume "clean" unless mtime or st_size says otherwise.

Even though it may not be the end of the world, that is certainly
bad. Recording the constituent fields separately without the statcrc
microoptimization, thereby not shaving a handful of bytes per the
index entry, is not the end of the world either in the same sense,
which leads us to question the benefit we would be getting from such
a change.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]