Re: [PATCHv2] Warnings before rebasing -i published history

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Lucien Kong <Lucien.Kong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

"git rebase -i" can be very dangerous if used on an already published
history. This code detects that one is rewriting a commit that is an
ancestor of a remote-tracking branch, and warns the user through the
editor. This feature is controlled by a new config key
rebase.checkremoterefs.

For the lazy, you could provide an example of result in the commit
message. People don't want to review how the patch is written if they
disagree with the result.

Right, but wouldn't it be better to put the example in the doc
git-rebase.txt ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]