Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] wt-status: better advices for git status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> These are not independent (you cannot be in bisect and am at the
>> same time).
>
> You should not, but it seems you can. At least, I just successfully
> started a "git am" during a "git bisect".

Yeah, that actually is a sensible thing to support (and I am happy
to hear it still works).

> The variable naming is wrong (it could be s/conflicts/unmerged_present/
> and s/unmerged_state/merge_in_progress/ for example). But these two
> variables are indeed independant. You can have unmerged path without an
> actual merge in progress (conflicts during "git am"), an you can have a
> merge in progress without conflicts (if you've just "git add"-ed them).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]