Re: [PATCHv2] Do not autosquash in case of an implied interactive rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Or did you mean that you want to imply "--interactive" when
> "--autosquash" is explicitly given ?

Come to think of it, it might have been a saner UI design when
f59baa5 (rebase -i --autosquash: auto-squash commits, 2009-12-08)
added this option, but if we want to go that route, we do need to
address the concerns I raised in my response.

But as things stand, i.e. with --autosquash that does not imply -i,
your patch is good.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]