Re: [PATCHv2] Do not autosquash in case of an implied interactive rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Op 25-5-2012 19:50, Junio C Hamano schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn<vfr@xxxxxxx>  writes:

The option to autosquash is only used in case of an interactive rebase.
When merges are preserved, rebase uses an interactive rebase internally,
but in this case autosquash should still be disabled.

Signed-off-by: Vincent van Ravesteijn<vfr@xxxxxxx>
Hrm, what if the end user said "git rebase --autosquash -p" explicitly
from the command line?

The option "--autosquash" is designed to have no effect whenever "--interactive" is not supplied.

This is what you also argue in another thread (http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/198579):

\"And that "I want rebase with --autosquash but I am not going to do any other editing" is where my suggestion to use "--no-edit" comes from.\"

Or did you mean that you want to imply "--interactive" when "--autosquash" is explicitly given ?

Vincent
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]