Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> When talking about an ambiguous expression X that can be in multiple ways >> and each interpretation gives surprisingly different result, if there are >> ways A, B and C to unambiguously spell each and every of its possible and >> useful interpretations, and if one of the interpretations C is to ignore >> the expression altogether, it is preferrable to either >> >> (1) warn if it does not trigger anything useful to write a no-op; or >> (2) just ignore it if a no-op is a meaningful behaviour >> >> when you see X. > > except that we do the ignoring in (2) but I don't see this as a > meaningful behavior. That would mean you would want to update the code to do (1), not silently trigger a different behaviour. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html