Re: [PATCH WIP 0/3] top-level gitignore considered less harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 08:25:54PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > The result is not so impressive (i'm on -O0 though). Old webkit.git,
>> > before:
>>
>> (it's "git status" by the way)
>>
>> >
>> > real    0m6.418s
>> > user    0m5.561s
>> > sys     0m0.827s
>> >
>> > after:
>> >
>> > real    0m5.262s
>> > user    0m4.407s
>> > sys     0m0.850s
>>
>> and with your patch to redistribute .gitignore in webkit, so top-level
>> is small again:
>>
>> real    0m4.185s
>> user    0m3.271s
>> sys     0m0.905s
>>
>> so my numbers look "ok".
>
> Is that last number just with the redistribution, or with the
> redistribution _and_ your patch? I'd like to see both to see whether it
> is the case that the two optimizations work together for combined
> benefit, or if doing one makes the other one pointless.

without my patch. redistribution with my patch is:

real    0m4.284s
user    0m3.407s
sys     0m0.864s
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]