Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] gitweb: Use print_diff_chunk() for both side-by-side and inline diffs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Michał Kiedrowicz wrote:
> > Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > BTW. I was wondering about binary files, but this commit wouldn't
> > > make it worse anyway as we parse diff output assuming
> > > unified-like diff for diff syntax highlighting... and binary
> > > diffs are shown as
> > > 
> > >   "Binary files a/foo.png and b/foo.png differ"
> > > 
> > > in extended diff header.
> > 
> > Yeah, this is what I wrote in the cover letter:
> > 
> > 	* Ensured that binary patches are not supported in HTML
> > format, thus this series canot break it :) (answering Jakub's
> > questions)
> > 
> > but maybe I wasn't clear enough.
> 
> Eh, sorry, this was more of reminder to myself, rather than
> questioning you if you really checked that.  Sorry for that. 
> 

OK, no problem.  Thanks for your very thorough review.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]