Re: [PATCH] "master" should be treated no differently from any other branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Andy Parkins wrote:

> Making "master" special rather than simply a default means git is 
> dictating policy.  It isn't git's place to decide what my branches are 
> called, especially as it is git itself that lets me choose freely to 
> begin with.

Fine. I don't give a flying fly. And if -- by making this and related 
changes -- new users find it even harder to start with Git, I will ignore 
any complaints. I mean, this is yet something new in an almost-everyday 
message that the user has to get used to.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]