Re: [PATCH] "master" should be treated no differently from any other branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > have a convention here than configurability. You would not want "git" to
> > be called "guitar" for some users, just because they happen to like that
> > name more, either, right?
>
> You're correct; but we're talking about branch names not program names.

And the analogy is flawed.  I don't want git to be called guitar, however I'd 
be very upset if I got
  
 $ mv git guitar
 Error: git is conventionally called guitar


Andy

-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE
andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]