Hi, On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On 13/12/06, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > > Although I would feel very happy about this change, Catalin > > > might want to be informed about potential interaction this > > > change might have with his commit 8d41555 in StGIT. > > > > Indeed. Catalin, do you have any suggestion how to proceed? Do you want to > > introduce a check if the file exists prior to re-generating it? Or do you > > need some version check? > > It currently checks whether the file exists and, if it doesn't, it is > re-generated. I think the patch is good idea. Thanks. > > BTW why is StGit not on kernel.org? > > Why would it be? Unless you know who to talk to for this :-), it's not > really a derivative of the Linux kernel. There is plenty of stuff on kernel.org which is only related to the Linux kernel. And StGit (even if I did not try it yet), seems to be very valuable for working on the kernel. > > Not that it matters: repo.or.cz has a nice mirror. Pasky, how powerful is > > that machine? I am a happy user of the gitweb interface on that box... > > Hopefully, when I get a bit of time, I'll try to give up the > http-hosted repository and use Pasky's one exclusively. > > BTW, how can I notify people that only pull from the http repository > that it will no longer be updated (rather than them thinking the > development stopped)? One solution would be to create a file with a > meaningful name in the top dir and hope people will notice it. IMHO removing it altogether would be a good idea. The website should carry the news of the new repository site. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html