StGit repo & gitweb, was Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: add/add really is modify/modify with an empty base

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Although I would feel very happy about this change, Catalin
> might want to be informed about potential interaction this
> change might have with his commit 8d41555 in StGIT.

Indeed. Catalin, do you have any suggestion how to proceed? Do you want to 
introduce a check if the file exists prior to re-generating it? Or do you 
need some version check?

BTW why is StGit not on kernel.org?

Not that it matters: repo.or.cz has a nice mirror. Pasky, how powerful is 
that machine? I am a happy user of the gitweb interface on that box...

Yet another question: On repo.or.cz, I searched for the "commit" "8d41555" 
(upper right side, very nice, although the search button is lacking, which 
is needed for some browsers like w3m). But I got _two_ results, the one I 
expected, and its child (probably because it contains the sha1 as part of 
the parent tag). Is this intended behaviour? After all, I search for the 
commit...

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]