Re: Why Is There No Bug Tracker And Why Are Patches Sent Instead Of Pull Requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Joern Huxhorn <jhuxhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> To get accepted in this community, an issue tracker would need to be decentralized (obviously including the ability to merge issue state and so on, likely git-based,
> probably simply included in the normal git repository of a project or in a separate issues-branch) and require a proper command line interface so it is properly
> scriptable (to feed it with threads from this mailing list, for example).
>
> I'd love such a system.

Take a look at Veracity ( http://veracity-scm.com/ )

Also, do not forget issue tracking must be possible for people who do
not use git. That's why we use git hosted at Assembla (
http://www.assembla.com ) at work: 2/3 of the people in the project
are not developers but marketing, verification, validation, support,
trainers, management, etc.

-- 
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]