Re: [PATCH v2] Perform cheaper connectivity check when pack is used as medium

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> But now you brought it up, I think we may also need to worry about a
>> corrupt pre-existing loose blob object. In general, we tend to always
>> favor reading objects from packs over loose objects, but I do not know
>> offhand what repacking would do when there are two places it can read the
>> same object from (it should be allowed to pick whichever is easier to
>> read).
>
> Corrupt accidentally or on purpose?

Does not matter. The attack outlined does not require you to write a
corrupt one into victim's repository. You only need to _know_ one
that the victim happens to have.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]