Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > JC: >> Perhaps the maximum for garph_width should be raised to something like >> "min(80, stat_width) - name_width"? > I think that a graph like > a | 1000 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > b | 1 - > is not very readable. I like the consistency forced by the 40-column limit. > But I guess that this is very subjective. The above makes it very obvious that there is a huge amount of change made to 'a' and a bit of deletion to 'b', compared to a mini-graph that is truncated to half the screen width. Besides, the above is what you would get without your patch on 80-column terminal, no? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html