Re: [PATCH v2] Add a setting to require a filter to be successful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-02-17 16:07, Junio C Hamano wrote:
A few test in t0021 use 'false' as the filter, which can exit without
reading any byte from us, before we start writing and causes us to die
with SIGPIPE, leading to intermittent test failure.  I think treating this
as a failure of running the filter (the end user's filter should read what
is fed in full, produce its output and write the result back to us) is the
right thing to do, and this patch needs more work to handle such a
situation better, probably by using sigchain_push(SIGPIPE) or something.

If I understand what you're saying, current version of git already have the problem: if a filter fails without reading anything, git will die instead of using the unfiltered content. My patch has only made the issue apparent by testing with a failing filter.
Am I understanding correctly?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]