Re: [PATCH 1/3 v5] diff --stat: tests for long filenames and big change counts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 02/15/2012 06:12 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx>  writes:
>>
>>> Eleven tests for various combinations of a long filename and/or big
>>> change count and ways to specify widths for diff --stat.
>>> ---
>>
>> Sign-off?
>
>> Hrm, this does not seem to pass, making the result of applying [1/3] fail;
>> I see that the elided name is shown much shorter than the above expects.
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry for not properly testing the patch with tests. I somehow
> convinced myself that the tests pass. This whole series needs more
> work, even after squashing in your two patches.

It is nothing to be sorry about if a series needs more polishing; that is
what the review discussions are for.

I've queued the series after restructuring it, and merged except for [3/3]
to 'pu', which conflicts too heavily with the nd/diffstat-gramnum topic
that is already in 'master'.  I'd say we should concentrate on your first
two patches without the "num-width" stuff and get them in first, and then
later consider if rerolling the [3/3] patch is worth it after the dust
settles.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]