Re: [PATCH v2 28/51] refs.c: rename ref_array -> ref_dir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/10/2012 10:17 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>>> If everything_local() is trying to check that the references are in the
>>> local repository plus alternates, then it is incorrect that
>>> everything_local() doesn't consider alternate references in its
>>> determination.  My guess is that this is the case, and that something
>>> like the following might be the fix:
>>
>> Junio could answer more authoritatively than I, but I am pretty sure it
>> is the latter. The point is to skip the expensive find_common
>> negotiation if we know that there are no objects to fetch. Thus the
>> "local" here is "do we have them on this side of the git-protocol
>> connection", not "do we have them in our non-alternates repository".
> 
> Correct.  The function is about "do we need to get any object from the
> other side?" optimization.

Thanks for your feedback.  I have just submitted a patch series [1] that
attempts to fix this problem.

Michael

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/190488

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]