Re: [PATCH v2 28/51] refs.c: rename ref_array -> ref_dir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>> If everything_local() is trying to check that the references are in the
>> local repository plus alternates, then it is incorrect that
>> everything_local() doesn't consider alternate references in its
>> determination.  My guess is that this is the case, and that something
>> like the following might be the fix:
>
> Junio could answer more authoritatively than I, but I am pretty sure it
> is the latter. The point is to skip the expensive find_common
> negotiation if we know that there are no objects to fetch. Thus the
> "local" here is "do we have them on this side of the git-protocol
> connection", not "do we have them in our non-alternates repository".

Correct.  The function is about "do we need to get any object from the
other side?" optimization.

I originally thought to go through the rest of your message, but I
realized I can just say "everything you said is correct and I have nothing
more to add."

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]