Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > OK, that's easy enough to do. Should we show lightweight tags to commits > for backwards compatibility (and just drop the parse_signature junk in > that case)? The showing of blobs or trees is the really bad thing, I > think. I think that is a sensible thing to do. I see many end-user documents on the Interweb that uses lightweight "git tag", and I do not think they are shooting for brevity of their illustration. The authors of these pages do primarily use lightweight tags because they do not have anything more to add in the message more than the log message commit objects they point at. And it is a huge regression if we stop showing them if they are used to use "tag -n". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html