Re: [PATCH 3/3] add test case for recursive merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > this test succeeds consistently on the machine where I tested it 
> > originally, but fails on another of my machines, but only when run without 
> > "-v". Very annoying. I will not have time to investigate until Monday, 
> > though.
> 
> There seem to be cases where stage #1 contains blob 'B' or 'A'
> or nothing depending on something totally random.  Ring a bell?

Not at all.

It seems that one merge is conflicting on "a1", and not storing _anything_ 
in the resulting (unclean) tree. So, there is no stage 1.

However, I also saw that something is left in stage 1 on the box where the 
problem arises. Tomorrow.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]