Re: Collection of stgit issues and wishes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 10/12/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> The git commands StGit uses to perform operations automatically record
>> changes in branches in reflog. What StGit does not provide is the "reason".
>> You do use git-update-ref?
> 
> Yes, only for updating HEAD. The refs in refs/patches/<branch>/ are
> written directly. I initialy wanted to add patch history support using
> reflogs and added "git-update-ref -m ..." for the patch commits but I
> found slow the pushing operation a bit. Do you only want to track the
> reflogs for HEAD?

Yes, I want for StGit to provide reasons when updating HEAD. I know that
StGit manages it's own versioning of patches not using reflog -- fine.
What matters for me is reflog for HEAD after "stg commit; stg clean".

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]