Re: Collection of stgit issues and wishes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/12/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 10/12/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Here are some issues which are a bit annoying for me:
>>>> - make "stg help" (without command name) equivalent to "stg --help"
>
> There was a patch in this area. Doesn't it work correctly now?

I use stgit 0.11

I was in general referring to the latest HEAD in the StGIT repository.


1056:[gitweb/web!git]$ stg help
usage: stg help <command>

while "stg --help" lists all commands.

Works correctly in the latest snapshot.

>> And as far as I can see it doe not use git credentials (user.name and
>> user.email).
>
> StGIT now uses the GIT credentials (and config files).

Hmmm... in stgit 0.11 "stg refresh --sign" once gave me Signed-off-by:
Nobody line instead of using git user.name and user.email.

Again, it is different in the latest snapshot (feature added post 0.11).

The git commands StGit uses to perform operations automatically record
changes in branches in reflog. What StGit does not provide is the "reason".
You do use git-update-ref?

Yes, only for updating HEAD. The refs in refs/patches/<branch>/ are
written directly. I initialy wanted to add patch history support using
reflogs and added "git-update-ref -m ..." for the patch commits but I
found slow the pushing operation a bit. Do you only want to track the
reflogs for HEAD?

--
Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]