Re: [PATCH 1/3] completion: be nicer with zsh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> In any case, there's no need for ad hominem arguments; there is a
> problem when using zsh, that's a fact.

There was no ad-hominem argument at all.

Read your two lines I quoted "... the code is now actually understandable
(at least to me), while before it looked like voodoo", which was your
words.  What does it tell the reader?  The patch author (1) did not
understand existing code (voodoo) and (2) the change is a good thing as a
style/readability improvement.

I was saying that I did not want to see that in the justification, because
(2) is not true, while (1) may be.

The patch as-is is a good change that works around issues with zsh's POSIX
emulation, and that is sufficient-enough justification. IOW, we are in
agreement on the later half of your sentence.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]