Re: [PATCH] git-sh-i18n: detect and avoid broken gettext(1) implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 21:26, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> .... Besides, the current version
>> wont have problems with such an upgrade.
>
> Yes, but at what cost?

A fixed number of "fork and exec" for every executed ". git-sh-i18n" line?
The overhead might be considered negligible...

Er. Am I missing something very obvious? (not obvious to me, yet)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]