Re: [PATCH] i18n: disable i18n for shell scripts if NO_GETTEXT defined

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 16:22, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 14:42, Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Otherwise the i18n is used in the scripts even with NO_GETTEXT set.
>> It is very unexpected.
>
> So the reason it's like that is that I was assuming that gettext.sh
> wouldn't be FUBAR anywhere, but the translations shouldn't kick in
> since we haven't installed them during "make install".
>
> But I wonder if this negatively affects some systems, now we now:
>
>  * Don't use gettext.sh, which means that we're using our fallback
>   shell function instead of the binary gettext(1), which is probably
>   faster.
>
>  * Use our own eval_gettext() instead of using the system one, which
>   uses the GNU binary which is more likely to be in the FS cache
>   already since other programs are probably using it.
>
> Which is why I didn't do something like this to begin with.

Well, if I say NO_GETTEXT, I kind of want none of local gettext,
whether it works, or not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]