Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] nd/clone-detached

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Hmm, 'pu' seems to fail its selftest with this merge present, though.
>
> The commit "refuse to clone if --branch points to bogus ref" from this
> series changes clone's behavior that t5500.31, which is added in
> nd/clone-single-branch, relies on.

Ahh, of course.

> Another cleaner approach is to combine the two clone series into
> one.

I think "--single-branch" is much more relevant compared to cloning from a
repository with some funkiness like detached HEAD which is more about a
theoretical fun exercise, so let's rebuild this on top of the other one.

Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]