Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] nd/clone-detached

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> 2012/1/14 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Thanks, replaced (and updated comment strings read much better).
>>
>> There were some conlicts I had to resolve while merging this to 'pu'.
>> I would appreciate it if you can eyeball it to make sure I didn't make
>> silly mistakes there.
>
> Right, the conflict with nd/clone-single-branch. I kept thinking there
> would not be conflict because clone-single-branch's big change was in
> wanted_peer_refs() and missed write_followtags() call. The merge looks
> good.

Hmm, 'pu' seems to fail its selftest with this merge present, though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]